Real accounts. Real dashboards. Real revenue.
Every result below came from a real account, not a template. Pick what you do, see how the system performed for someone doing the same thing.
Return on ad spend, across every account we're showing you.
The top 15 real results by ROAS. Filter by industry, hover any bar for the exact numbers behind it.
Curious where your account would land on this chart?
Find Out in 30 SecondsWhat are you trying to grow?
Don't see your exact niche yet? We probably still have the answer.
Ask About Your Vertical$1.25M in net sales. One bicycle brand. The full Fenix Growth System, screenshots included.
Every number below is from the actual Shopify, Meta and Google accounts, screenshotted month by month. Product names are blurred to protect the brand's identity, the results aren't.
See if we can build the same kind of system for your store.
See What We'd Build For YouReal dashboards, not mockups.
Shopify · Jan 1 – Aug 31, 2026 · Total sales $1,381,171.94, net sales $1,253,474.33, +150% YoY
Meta Ads Manager · $164,622.36 spent, 1,389 website purchases, 6.68x purchase ROAS, campaign names blurred
Google Ads · Jan 1 – Aug 31, 2026 · ~$763K attributed conversion value on $24.3K spend
January 2026 · $83,811.20 total sales
February 2026 · $143,408.17 total sales
March 2026 · $171,737.50 total sales
April 2026 · $157,357.33 total sales
May 2026 · $221,939.16 total sales
June 2026 · $227,500.68 total sales
July 2026 · $203,412.89 total sales
August 2026 · $172,005.01 total sales
A $670 average order isn't an impulse buy.
Scaling a premium product is different from scaling a low-ticket one. The real buying journey rarely looks like see ad, click, buy. It looks like: see a video, visit the site, leave, see another ad, search Google days later, compare, come back through retargeting, add to cart, leave again, get an email, then finally purchase. If Meta, Google, creative, retargeting and email are all managed independently, each one starts optimizing for its own numbers instead of the actual customer. The goal wasn't more traffic. It was a system where every interaction increased the odds of the next one.
Meta claimed $1.10M. Google claimed $700K. Shopify recorded $1.25M.
Those numbers don't add up to $1.8M, and they were never supposed to. A single customer can see a Meta video, not click, search Google three days later, click that ad, leave, see Meta retargeting, and buy two days after that. Both platforms can honestly claim partial credit for the same order. Shopify only ever recorded one purchase. That's why net Shopify sales, not platform-reported revenue, was the number this case study is built around.
Historical ROAS tells you what happened. It doesn't tell you what to do next.
If Google historically reports 8x and Meta reports 6.68x, the obvious move looks like shifting budget to Google. But if Google is already capturing nearly all the high-intent demand available, the next $1,000 there might return 3x, while Meta could absorb that same $1,000 at 5x and create new branded search demand Google later captures anyway. That's the difference between average ROAS and marginal ROAS, and it's the actual question that decided where the next dollar went, not which dashboard looked better that week.
This is one account. Imagine what it looks like with your numbers in it.
Book a Strategy CallReady to see this built around your account instead of someone else's?
Talk To FenixSee if a strategy call makes sense for you.
Four quick questions, then you'll know exactly what to book.